|05-23-13 (yeti) Reply
|That was one of the pieces of evidence I used in the "hypothesis" below.
I still believe the sets were all done in a few months of time, max. Some other reasons exist, but I'd rather not get into those because I respect what I perceive to be a model's personal privacy. Besides, I could be totally wrong. :)
Anyway, it's kind of to Met-Art's benefit that the time stamps in later released sets were removed, to preserve the "illusion" that the content is as fresh as possible. I think they started removing those years ago, because I haven't seen any from any set for any model.
Serious business! :)
|05-22-13 (walter34) Reply
|All my Met Models sets have the date and time on the pics and some of my early sets of Met Art have that to. They say the pics were taken in 2008. I wish all the Met Art sets had them then we would know for sure when they were taken. I only say this because the later sets she kind of looks a little older. What do you think?
|05-14-13 (max86) Reply
|could one of you guys make a torrent of the whole sets of Izolda's , thanks
|04-22-13 (PaCo) Reply
|04-22-13 (yeti) Reply
|MET-Art turned me off when they began to cater to hardcore models and themes, including new brands and such. Forgive me if I oppose such, but it is simply a matter of taste. I do find it hypocritical, considering the original "idea" of MET-Art, but whatever makes money -- right? So, it is in this instance I am happy this model has been (by our suspicions until recent confirmation, at least) retired.
She is far, far too beautiful to do hardcore or even more than pure glamor. Really, we should be thankful. :)
I don't think I was being clear enough, now that I look back.
As I said before, I'm sure this model has been retired from "nude modeling" for years. It's just that Met-Art ran out of sets to publish. Again, my theory is she was shot by Ingret (a female photographer) for a short time in either late 2007 or early 2008. Met-Art doesn't really have any control over the direction of what took place, only whether or not they choose to purchase the rights to the sets from Ingret (which they clearly chose to).
Now as I was trying to say but perhaps didn't quite clearly, I'm a *little* bit glad (or relieved) there are no more sets because of Met-Art's "branching out" lately. What they were known for before (young, beautiful, fresh-faced women) has become a little diluted because of their affiliated brands (Sex-Art, The Life Erotic, various sex cams) and publishing choices (using more known porn stars). That is just *my* personal opinion, and I don't have anything against those who enjoy more hardcore things or the actors/models themselves. But, it's definitely a change in Met-Art's historical tastes, of which I'm a little bit critical of, considering -- again -- what they seemed to stand for previously.
So, it's kind of bittersweet. And to answer your question about where I heard this confirmation of her retirement/no more new sets: it was Met-Art themselves. I simply asked, and they were gracious enough to confirm my suspicions. They didn't have to tell me that, and it was very cool of them to do so.
PS: I hate to be a dream crusher again, but I wouldn't expect her to make an appearance on any other sites. Like I said, I think she made the choice to quit nude modeling a few years ago.
That's unlikely cuz Izolda has always done exactly what the metart guys want. And if she really doesn't like metart, Domai is always there.
But if that's why Inna C quit modeling, I swear I'll kill those stupid metart guys. God knows how I miss her.
|04-18-13 (Lucky) Reply
|Noooooo!!! please say it isn't so. I knew this day would come but I didn't expect it so soon. I'm glad for the sets we do have, just wish there were more. I'm sure you guys would agree that we could never get enough of her. The goddess will no longer bless us with her presence. Knowing this makes the world seem a little bit gloomier now.
Izolda you are a true beauty that no other model could come close to. You will be missed for sure.
|03-24-13 (yeti) Reply
|I have a suspicion her MET sets were all done in a few months of time, within 2008. I don't know for sure but I believe quite a few models work like this, probably on a one-time contract or something similar. Her Art of Gloss sets were also done around this time, although they were released later in 2010-11 when the site revamped.
It's not uncommon for sets to be released years after a girl retires from nude modeling.
This makes excellent sense business-wise -- for MET-Art at least -- to drag out a model's sets as long as possible to maximize subscriptions. I know they've gotten their fair share of money from me, which would not have been so if not for this charming model.
But that doesn't mean more sets won't be released. If anything, I bet at least a few more will. It's not that uncommon to go several months between sets. What I really wish for, however, is a video. But I don't think Ingret does this. Another photographer would have been nice, too, for variety's sake.
But even if her sets are completed, it's nice having what there is so far. :)
Where exactly did you "hear" that "officially"?
Unfortunately, Izolda A. is retired from nude modeling. That is not-so-surprising. [As I said...]
However, Met-Art has no more sets to publish. This I heard officially.
But I'm happy I have what I have. :)
|03-19-13 (Narrator21) Reply
|5 month now. :/
Guess she finished her academic study and quit nude modeling.
Sad but on the bright side, I managed to collect all existing MA sets of her. :)
Don't want to join artofgloss just for 2 sets...
|02-18-13 (kratosred) Reply
|It's been more than 4 months since her last set. She's breaking a lot of weak hearts out there.
|01-29-13 (yeti) Reply
|Met-Art, of course. :P